The Argument from Design—a Reply to R. G. Swinburne1: A. OLDING

Religious Studies 7 (4):361-373 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Of all the arguments for the existence of God, the argument from design is in many respects the most impressive, as everyone remarks that Kant remarked. Certainly it is an argument which seems to have appealed to the popular imagination and even today does not lack philosophical proponents. The purpose of the present paper is to examine a recent formulation of the argument. In particular I shall be concerned to bring into the open its dualist assumptions and to show how these militate against its general plausibility

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Argument from Design—a Reply to R. G. Swinburne.A. Olding - 1971 - Religious Studies 7 (4):361 - 373.
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
The Laws of Physics and the Design of the Universe.Stephen M. Barr - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 893--910.
Modern cosmology - a cognitive approach God?Winfried Loffler - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (8):157-171.
Design—A Further Reply to R. G. Swinburne.A. Olding - 1973 - Religious Studies 9 (2):229 - 232.
Structural flaws: Massive modularity and the argument from design.Armin Schulz - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):733-743.
The argument from design.R. G. Swinburne - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (165):199 - 212.
Anthropocentrism and the design argument.Neil A. Manson - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (2):163-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
21 (#743,384)

6 months
6 (#531,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Simplicity and Theology.Don Fawkes & Tom Smythe - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):259 - 270.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references