Did Einstein prove E=mc2?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):167-173 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.
Einstein’s 1935 Derivation of E=mc2.Francisco Flores - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (2):223-243.
Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=Mc2.N. David Mermin - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (1):1-2.
In Defence of Einstein.Gerald Keaney - 2008 - Crossroads 3 (1):64-68.
Einstein and Aquinas: a rapprochement.John F. Kiley - 1970 - The Hague,: Martinus Nijhoff.
On the Role of the Michelson–Morley Experiment: Einstein in Chicago.Jeroen van Dongen - 2009 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63 (6):655-663.
Einstein and EPR.Robert Deltete & Reed Guy - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):377-397.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-01

Downloads
41 (#391,763)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Value of Surprise in Science.Steven French & Alice Murphy - 2023 - Erkenntnis 88 (4):1447-1466.
Mass‐energy‐momentum: Only there because of spacetime.Dennis Lehmkuhl - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):453-488.
‘Like thermodynamics before Boltzmann.’ On the emergence of Einstein's distinction between constructive and principle theories.Marco Giovanelli - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 71 (C):118-157.
A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.
Reply to Ohanian's comment.N. David Mermin - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):218-219.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations