The senses as psychological kinds

In Fiona Macpherson (ed.), The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The distinction we make between five different senses is a universal one.<sup>1</sup> Rather than speaking of generically perceiving something, we talk of perceiving in one of five determinate ways: we see, hear, touch, smell, and taste things. In distinguishing determinate ways of perceiving things what are we distinguishing between? What, in other words, is a sense modality?<sup>2</sup> An answer to this question must tell us what constitutes a sense modality and so needs to do more than simply describe differences in virtue of which we can distinguish the perceptions of different senses. There are many such differences

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cross-modality and the self.Jonardon Ganeri - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):639-658.
Discriminating senses.Matthew Nudds - 2009 - The Philosophers' Magazine 45 (45):92-98.
Modes of perceiving and imagining.Matthew Nudds - 2000 - Acta Analytica 15 (24):139-150.
Taxonomising the Senses.Fiona Macpherson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):123-142.
Aristotle on the common sense.Pavel Gregoric - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Bodily awareness, imagination, and the self.Joel Smith - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):49-68.
The significance of the senses.Matthew Nudds - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):31-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
217 (#93,323)

6 months
7 (#436,298)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Nudds
University of Warwick

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references