What's right with the open question argument

In Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.), Themes From G. E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology and Ethics. Oxford University Press (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ethics . . . [is] partly analysis of what’s meant by ‘good’, ‘ought’, ‘right’, ‘wrong’, ‘valuable’, etc. And if certain analyses of these are right, then other ethical propositions, ones which aren’t analytic, wouldn’t be philosophical at all, but belong to psychology, sociology, and the theory of evolution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
152 (#123,462)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susana Nuccetelli
St. Cloud State University

Citations of this work

Phenomenal, Normative, and Other Explanatory Gaps: A General Diagnosis.Neil Mehta - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (3):567-591.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references