Ask Not What You Can Do for Yourself: Cartesian Chaos, Neural Dynamics, and Immunological Cognition [Book Review]

Biosemiotics 3 (1):79-92 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper focuses on the disparate phenomena we psychologize as “selfhood”. A central argument is that, far from being a deus ex machina as required in the Cartesian schema, our felt experience of self is above all a consequence of data compression. In coming to this conclusion, it considers in turn the Cartesian epiphany, other traditional and contemporary perspectives, and a half-century’s empirical work in the Freeman lab on neurodynamics. We introduce the concept of consciousness qua process as a force.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consciousness, neural functionalism, real subjectivity.Ted Honderich - 1995 - American Philosophical Quarterly 32 (4):369-381.
Comparative studies provide evidence for neural reuse.Paul S. Katz - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):278-279.
Organizing the brain's diversities.Michael A. Arbib & Peter Érdi - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):551-565.
Descartes, Spacetime, and Relational Motion.Edward Slowik - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (1):117-139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
33 (#497,934)

6 months
11 (#270,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?