Out of the Labyrinth: Einstein, Hertz and Göttingen Answer to the Hole Argument

In John Norton (ed.) (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Einstein algebras and the hole argument.Jonathan Bain - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1073-1085.
Einstein's hole argument.Alan Macdonald - 2001 - American Journal of Physics 69:223-225.
Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’.James Owen Weatherall - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw012.
Einstein and EPR.Robert Deltete & Reed Guy - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):377-397.
Holes, haecceitism and two conceptions of determinism.Joseph Melia - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):639--64.
Albert Einstein Meets David Lewis.Jeremy Butterfield - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:65-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-17

Downloads
32 (#513,753)

6 months
9 (#352,597)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Don Howard
University of Notre Dame
John D. Norton
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Change in Hamiltonian general relativity from the lack of a time-like Killing vector field.J. Brian Pitts - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:68-89.
`Nature is the Realisation of the Simplest Conceivable Mathematical Ideas': Einstein and the Canon of Mathematical Simplicity.John D. Norton - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (2):135-170.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references