“Don’t Talk Back!”—The Subjective Conditions of Critical Public Debate

Political Theory 40 (6):802 - 810 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/0090591712457662

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Limits of the Public Sphere: The Advocacy of Violence.Catriona Mackenzie & Sarah Sorial - 2011 - Critical Horizons 12 (2):165-188.
An epistemology for the study of consciousness.Max Velmans - 2007 - In Max Velmans & Susan Schneider (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 711--725.
The Impossibility of the Public.Hsin-I. Liu - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
Theory-Talk, Meta-Theory- Talk and Metaphysical-Talk: Intricacies and Pertinence of three Levels of Discourse in the Scientific Realism-Debate.Sreekumar Jayadevan - manuscript
Why do we need to know what the public thinks about nanotechnology?Craig Cormick - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (2):167-173.
Public opinion: Bringing the media back in.Jeffrey Friedman - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (3-4):239-260.
Reflective judgment and enlarged thinking online.May Thorseth - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (4):221-231.
Public Debate – An Act of Hostility?Charlotte Jørgensen - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (4):431-443.
The Role of Ethics Committees in Public Debate.Lonneke M. Poort - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):19-35.
Public relations and the tobacco industry: Examining the debate on practictioner ethics.Steven R. Thomsen - 1998 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (3):152 – 164.
As one is: to free the mind from all conditioning.J. Krishnamurti - 2007 - Prescott, Ariz.: Hohm Press.
Truth and acceptance conditions for moral statements can be identical: Further support for subjective consequentialism.Scott Forschler - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (3):337-346.
Thing talk moonlighting.Mark Crimmins - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):83 - 98.
Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values.James P. Sterba - 1999 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (1):1-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
31 (#520,333)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references