Definability in the recursively enumerable degrees

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 2 (4):392-404 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

§1. Introduction. Natural sets that can be enumerated by a computable function always seem to be either actually computable or of the same complexity as the Halting Problem, the complete r.e. set K. The obvious question, first posed in Post [1944] and since then called Post's Problem is then just whether there are r.e. sets which are neither computable nor complete, i.e., neither recursive nor of the same Turing degree as K?Let be the r.e. degrees, i.e., the r.e. sets modulo the equivalence relation of equicomputable with the partial order induced by Turing computability. This structure is a partial order with least element 0, the degree of the computable sets, and greatest element 1 or 0′, the degree of K. Post's problem then asks if there are any other elements of.The solution of Post's problem by Friedberg [1957] and Muchnik [1956] was followed by various algebraic or order theoretic results that were interpreted as saying that the structure was in some way well behaved:Theorem 1.1. Every countable partial ordering or even uppersemilattice can be embedded into.Theorem 1.2. For every nonrecursive r.e. degreeathere are r.e. degreesb, c < asuch thatb ∨ c = a.Theorem 1.3. For every pair of nonrecursive r.e. degreesa < bthere is an r.e. degreecsuch thata < c < b.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
241 (#85,341)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the Definable Ideal Generated by Nonbounding C.E. Degrees.Liang Yu & Yue Yang - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (1):252 - 270.
On the definable ideal generated by nonbounding c.e. degrees.Yue Yang & Liang Yu - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (1):252-270.

Add more citations