From separability to unweighted sum: A case for utilitarianism [Book Review]

Theory and Decision 49 (4):299-312 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After reviewing the compelling case for separability (`social welfare is a separable function of individual utilities'), an argument is advanced for utilitarianism (defined as `social welfare is the unweighted sum of individual utilities'). Basically, a compelling individualism-type axiom leads us to (social welfare as an) unweighted sum (of individual utilities), given separability

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fair bias.Uzi Segal - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (2):213-229.
Distributive Justice and Welfarism in Utilitarianism.Jörg Schroth - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):123-146.
Einstein, bell, and nonseparable realism.Federico Laudisa - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3):309-329.
Can a sum change its parts?D. H. Sanford - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):235-239.
More Formalism at the Price of Less Substance.Geert Dumuijnck - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:161-169.
Multidimensional welfare aggregation.Christian List - 2004 - Public Choice 119:119-142.
How Should What Economists Call "Social Values" Be Measured.Paul Menzel - 1999 - The Journal of Ethics 3 (3):249 - 273.
Utilitarianism, contractualism and demandingness.Alison Hills - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):225-242.
Morality and ethics in organizational administration.Howard Adelman - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (9):665 - 678.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-21

Downloads
81 (#206,554)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Utilitarianism and the Social Nature of Persons.Nikhil Venkatesh - 2023 - Dissertation, University College London

Add more citations

References found in this work

Social Choice and Individual Values.Kenneth Joseph Arrow - 1951 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley: New York.
Mathematical Psychics.F. Y. Edgeworth - 1881 - Mind 6 (24):581-583.
What Should We Do About Future Generations?Yew-Kwang Ng - 1989 - Economics and Philosophy 5 (2):235.
Theories of Distributive Justice.John E. Roemer - 1997 - Mind 106 (424):795-797.

View all 7 references / Add more references