A Review of the Theoretical Bases of the Beats’ Repudiation of Capitalism [Book Review]

Janus Head 16 (2):94-127 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Beats perceived the ideals of corporate capitalism to be corrupting and destructive annihilating their individuality and freedom of choice. According to them, capitalism was as much of a dictatorship as communism. The Beats strived to introduce spirituality as an alternative to the materialism propagated by capitalism. They also believed that this system was so irrational that it led to wars and the invention and use of the nuclear bomb. They were discontented with American capitalism because it tried to socio-politically control the citizens. They claimed to have rejected or at least escaped capitalism which is debatable and the paper shows that in some cases they did not manage to do that.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bases de datos y representación del conocimiento.Ernesto García Camarero - 1985 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 1 (1):293-303.
Foucault’s turn from literature.Timothy O’Leary - 2008 - Continental Philosophy Review 41 (1):89-110.
Dispositions revisited.William W. Rozeboom - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (1):59-74.
Theoretical bases of patriotic education of preschool children in psychological and pedagogical literature.Artur Inshakov - 2017 - Science and Education: Academic Journal of Ushynsky University 22 (2):69-74.
Good as a Correlate of Community.Janusz Kuczyński - 2020 - Dialogue and Universalism 30 (2):245-260.
Beyond Capitalism and Marxism.Olatunji A. Oyeshile & Omotayo Oladebo - 2019 - Dialogue and Universalism 29 (1):217-232.
Rationality, possibility and difference as bases of moral development.Steven A. Wygant - 1994 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 15 (1):58-71.
Charles Dickens.Unsigned Review - 2020 - The Chesterton Review 46 (3-4):337-339.
Community with Nothing in Common? Plato's Subtler Response to Protagoras.Mark Sentesy - 2020 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (1):155-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-08-30

Downloads
5 (#1,559,673)

6 months
5 (#710,646)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references