The Role of Size Contrast and Empty Space in the Explanation of the Moon Illusion

Foundations of Science:1-18 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The much larger appearance of the moon near horizon than the perceived size of the moon at zenith has motivated many scientists to develop theories that aim at explaining this puzzling phenomenon. Considering that the size of retinal images of the moon in these positions are very similar, the explanation of difference in their apparent sizes has relied on perceptual cues of distance embedded in the retinal image of their respective contexts. Although this account of the moon illusion is quite popular, it does not explain all aspects of this phenomenon. The theoretical formulation of the moon illusion based on other factors such as size contrast later may have had some advantages but has also created some new problems. Although the moon is perceived in a three-dimensional (3D) environment, the present analysis proposes that an explanation of the moon illusion based on two-dimensional (2D) cues can remove some of the unnecessary problems. The empty space and size contrast that have already been considered in explaining classic geometric-optical illusions play a parallel role in explaining the moon illusion. In other words, the role of open space in interaction with the image of the moon and different objects near horizon, all reflected on the retina, are considered as the main explaining factors. The advantages of this approach will be discussed and some of the facts pertaining to the moon illusion will be explained within this theoretical framework.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Berkeley, helmholtz, the moon illusion, and two visual systems.Helen E. Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):116-117.
Visual Field and Empty Space.Kristjan Laasik - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy (published online):403-411.
The moon illusion.Frances Egan - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (4):604-23.
The Mystery of the Moon Illusion: Exploring Size Perception. [REVIEW]Klaus Hentschel - 2004 - British Journal for the History of Science 37 (2):233-233.
Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.Basileios Kroustallis - 2004 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2):151 - 166.
Specular Space.Clare Mac Cumhaill - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):487-495.
The moon illusion in pictures-apparent size and distance effects.S. Coren & Dj Aks - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (6):523-523.
Martianus Capella’s calculation of the size of the moon.Christián C. Carman - 2017 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 71 (2):193-210.
The relativity of ethical explanation.Kenneth Walden - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics 6.
Empty Space, Silence, and Absence.Laura Gow - 2021 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51 (7):496-507.
Self-Explanation and Empty-Base Explanation.Yannic Kappes - 2022 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8 (3):436-453.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-10

Downloads
7 (#1,407,939)

6 months
6 (#582,229)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations