Cut Elimination in the Presence of Axioms

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (4):418-435 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A way is found to add axioms to sequent calculi that maintains the eliminability of cut, through the representation of axioms as rules of inference of a suitable form. By this method, the structural analysis of proofs is extended from pure logic to free-variable theories, covering all classical theories, and a wide class of constructive theories. All results are proved for systems in which also the rules of weakening and contraction can be eliminated. Applications include a system of predicate logic with equality in which also cuts on the equality axioms are eliminated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Forcing Indestructibility of Set-Theoretic Axioms.Bernhard König - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):349 - 360.
Aspects of analytic deduction.Athanassios Tzouvaras - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (6):581-596.
Derivation rules as anti-axioms in modal logic.Yde Venema - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (3):1003-1034.
On extremal axioms.Rudolf Carnap, Friedrich Bachmann & H. G. Bohnert - 1981 - History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):67-85.
Measurement without archimedean axioms.Louis Narens - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (4):374-393.
Lévy hierarchy in weak set theories.Jiří Hanika - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (2):121 - 140.
Axioms in Mathematical Practice.Dirk Schlimm - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (1):37-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
105 (#166,821)

6 months
30 (#106,393)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jan Von Plato
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Faithfulness for naive validity.Ulf Hlobil - 2019 - Synthese 196 (11):4759-4774.
Proof Analysis in Modal Logic.Sara Negri - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (5-6):507-544.
A formal system for euclid’s elements.Jeremy Avigad, Edward Dean & John Mumma - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (4):700--768.
Proof analysis in intermediate logics.Roy Dyckhoff & Sara Negri - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (1):71-92.
Contraction, Infinitary Quantifiers, and Omega Paradoxes.Bruno Da Ré & Lucas Rosenblatt - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (4):611-629.

View all 45 citations / Add more citations