Abstract

Xenophon's Oeconomicus presents the boldest possible response to the city's charge that Socrates corrupted the young: the city itself, not Socrates, is guilty of this charge. The city's teaching about what constitutes a noble human being cannot be reconciled with the good of the human being as such; it actually opposes this good. While the would-be gentleman's desire to be noble shapes his understanding of household management, it fails to bring him the god-like self sufficiency he seeks. Socrates' critique of the perfect gentleman's education of his wife demonstrates why the sacrifices made for the household and the gods do not benefit those who seek to be noble. Over the course of the dialogue, images of the Socratic way of life emerge. By revealing the nature of philosophy and its relationship to the good and noble things which the city extols, this dialogue teaches its readers why the Socratic way of life benefits human beings