Terrorism, Emergency Powers, and the Role of the US Supreme Court: An Interview with Neal K. Katyal

Ratio Juris 20 (4):443-455 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

. The dialogue focuses on the major issues of the contemporary theoretical debate on judicial review and the Supreme Court's role in American constitutional democracy. The discussion begins with the US Supreme Court's case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, successfully argued by Prof. Katyal last year, and covers important issues such as the separation and balance of powers after 9/11, the legitimacy of the laws of terror, the relation between US constitutional law and foreign law, the counter‐majoritarian difficulties posed by the exercise of judicial review, and the legal academy's influence on legal practice

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The War Against Terrorism and the Rule of Law.Owen Fiss - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (2):235-256.
Terrorism, Supreme Emergency and Killing the Innocent.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2009 - Perspectives - The Review of International Affairs 17 (1):105-126.
Pacifism, Supreme Emergency, and Moral Tragedy.Nicholas Parkin - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (4):631-648.
Sources of Restoration of Statehood and its Constitutional Consolidation.Jonas Prapiestis - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):859-888.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
7 (#1,407,610)

6 months
3 (#1,037,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references