In Defence of the Production-Oriented Approach to the Ethical Criticism of Art: A Reply to James Harold

British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (4):567-576 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As James Harold notes in his generous and thoughtful commentary on Artistic Creation and Ethical Criticism (ACEC) (2020), there is much on which we agree, inclu.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Flaws in Artworks: An Argument for Contextual Conjunctivism.Tomas Koblizek - 2022 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 80 (4):453-463.
Aesthetic experience revisited.Noël Carroll - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (2):145-168.
The Interaction of Ethics and Aesthetics in Environmental Art.Ted Nannicelli - 2018 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (4):497-506.
Forced Choices and Self‐Defence.Phillip Montague - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):89-93.
A militant defence of democracy in hard times.Seyla Benhabib - 2021 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (1):7-12.
Two Trinities: Reply to Hasker.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):441 - 447.
The Poet's Defence.Niall Rudd - 1955 - Classical Quarterly 5 (3-4):142-148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-10

Downloads
10 (#1,200,758)

6 months
6 (#531,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ted Nannicelli
University of Queensland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Artistic (Counter) Speech.Daisy Dixon - 2022 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (4):409-419.
Autonomism Reconsidered.James Harold - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):137-147.

Add more references