Development of objective criteria to evaluate the authenticity of revelation

Zygon 43 (3):737-744 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Science has been dazzlingly successful in explaining nature. Scientific advances also have led to certain undesirable, though unintended, side effects, one of which is alienation from the spiritual. Revelation comes from the Divine. But what is the status of authenticity of a particular piece claimed to be revelation? What is its historical validity and current state of preservation? This essay proposes to develop a list of rational criteria, in consultation with all stakeholders, for addressing the subject. The aim is to bring objectivity into this discourse by placing it more on the turf of reason rather than basing it on considerations of faith and prior allegiance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

History as Revelation.Bernard Cooke - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):293-304.
Prophetic Experience as Revelation.Bernard Cooke - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (3):214-224.
Reply: A Further Defence of Christian Revelation.Richard Swinburne - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (3):395 - 400.
Revelation and Physicalism.Nic Damnjanovic - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (1):69-91.
Revelation in Islam.Rodney Blackhirst - 1994 - Asian Philosophy 4 (1):71-79.
Revelation in Our Knowledge of God.Richard Swinburne - 1992 - In Kelly James Clark (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Divine Revelation and Human Person.Balázs M. Mezei - 2006 - Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):337-354.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
114 (#157,771)

6 months
8 (#373,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references