Paradoxes of democratic accountability: Polarized parties, hard decisions, and no despot to Veto

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (1-2):91-113 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Parties are back, and many are cheering. Party polarization has voters seeing stark differences between Democrats and Republicans and demonstrating more ideological constraint than previous generations. But these signs of a more “responsible” electorate are an illusion, because the public is no more knowledgeable than ever about the type of “information” it needs if it is to exercise effective control over the public‐policy outcomes it cares the most about. Indeed, polarization has produced a political environment where both voters and policy makers may be less likely to learn about the potential consequences of their governing choices. The result is that holding elected politicians to account for policies treated as divisive ends in themselves has become easier—but that holding them accountable for policies intended as means to the achievement of consensual ends has become harder

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,705

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How hard are the sceptical paradoxes?Alex Byrne - 2004 - Noûs 38 (2):299–325.
Izabrana djela Blaženke Despot.Blaženka Despot - 2004 - Zagreb: Ženska infoteka. Edited by G. Bosanac.
Raz on Authority and Democracy.David Rondel - 2012 - Dialogue 51 (2):211-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
34 (#481,336)

6 months
8 (#406,766)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Deliberative democracy and political ignorance.Ilya Somin - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2-3):253-279.
Can Deliberative Democracy Be Partisan?Russell Muirhead - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2-3):129-157.
Political Epistemology.Jeffrey Friedman - 2014 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 26 (1-2):i-xiv.
Democracy and the Deliberative Conceit.Mark Pennington - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2):159-184.
Can Deliberative Democracy Be Partisan?Russell Muirhead - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2):129-157.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964).Philip E. Converse - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):1-74.
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs (2006).Charles S. Taber & Milton Lodge - 2012 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24 (2):157-184.
Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The epistemology and politics of ignorance.Jeffrey Friedman - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):1-58.
Taking ignorance seriously: Rejoinder to critics.Jeffrey Friedman - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):467-532.

View all 6 references / Add more references