Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in a new era

BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-5 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BackgroundAdvances in healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) are occurring rapidly and there is a growing discussion about managing its development. Many AI technologies end up owned and controlled by private entities. The nature of the implementation of AI could mean such corporations, clinics and public bodies will have a greater than typical role in obtaining, utilizing and protecting patient health information. This raises privacy issues relating to implementation and data security. Main bodyThe first set of concerns includes access, use and control of patient data in private hands. Some recent public–private partnerships for implementing AI have resulted in poor protection of privacy. As such, there have been calls for greater systemic oversight of big data health research. Appropriate safeguards must be in place to maintain privacy and patient agency. Private custodians of data can be impacted by competing goals and should be structurally encouraged to ensure data protection and to deter alternative use thereof. Another set of concerns relates to the external risk of privacy breaches through AI-driven methods. The ability to deidentify or anonymize patient health data may be compromised or even nullified in light of new algorithms that have successfully reidentified such data. This could increase the risk to patient data under private custodianship.ConclusionsWe are currently in a familiar situation in which regulation and oversight risk falling behind the technologies they govern. Regulation should emphasize patient agency and consent, and should encourage increasingly sophisticated methods of data anonymization and protection.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Protecting health privacy even when privacy is lost.T. J. Kasperbauer - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (11):768-772.
Biobank research and the right to privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Privacy and occupational health services.A. Heikkinen - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):522-525.
Privacy and policy for genetic research.Judith Wagner DeCew - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):5-14.
Health Information Privacy and Public Health.James G. Hodge - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):663-671.
Health Information Privacy and Public Health.James G. Hodge - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (4):663-671.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Is Information All We Need to Protect?David Meeler - 2008 - The Monist 91 (1):151-169.
Balancing Good Intentions: Protecting the Privacy of Electronic Health Information.Kitty McClanahan - 2008 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 28 (1):69-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-16

Downloads
28 (#569,856)

6 months
14 (#179,435)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?