Another look at legal moralism

Ethics 77 (1):50-56 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea that immoral conduct ought to be criminalized is already often rejected, But not for precisely the right reasons. Victim-Less crimes ought to be decriminalized not (as h l a hart and j s mill argue) because it is immoral to make crimes of them, But because it is contrary to the nature of the criminal law itself. Acts of private immorality do not violate the rights of the participants; thus they cannot be crimes because there is no crime where there is no deprivation of rights. (staff)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal moralism and retribution revisited.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 2007 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):5-20.
Legal moralism reconsidered.Carl F. Cranor - 1979 - Ethics 89 (2):147-164.
The Justification of Legal Moralism.John Kultgen - 1985 - Philosophical Topics 13 (2):123-131.
Boxing, Paternalism, and Legal Moralism.Nicholas Dixon - 2001 - Social Theory and Practice 27 (2):323-344.
Limited legal moralism.Richard Francis Galvin - 1988 - Criminal Justice Ethics 7 (2):23-36.
Liberalism, legal moralism and moral disagreement.Arthur Kuflik - 2005 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):185–198.
Legal moralism and the harm principle: A rejoinder.Arthur Ripstein - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (2):195–201.
New Legal Moralism: Some Strengths and Challenges.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):215-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#301,741)

6 months
9 (#312,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrie Murphy
PhD: University of Rochester; Last affiliation: Arizona State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references