Description's Objects: Austrian Variations

Swiss Philosophical Preprints (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What did Wittgenstein take description to involve ? What are the objects of his descriptions ? What did he think he was doing in and by describing what he described ? In order to answer these three questions it will be useful to appeal to an object of comparison. But which ? First we need an answer to another question.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Conceitualizando significado.Jasper Doomen - 2012 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 57 (2):84-98.
Rethinking objectivity in social science.Eleonora Montuschi - 2004 - Social Epistemology 18 (2-3):109-122.
What's in a Numeral? Frege's Answer.J. Weiner - 2007 - Mind 116 (463):677-716.
Categories for the working mathematician: making the impossible possible.Jessica Carter - 2008 - Synthese 162 (1):1-13.
On being called by one's name.Bruno Gnassounou - 2001 - Logica Trianguli 5:43-61.
Friedlands sterne oder facta und ficta.Rudolf Haller - 1983 - Erkenntnis 19 (1-3):153 - 165.
Nonexistent Possibles and Their Individuation.Garry Rosenkrantz - 1984 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 22 (1):127-147.
Nonexistent Possibles and Their Individuation.Garry Rosenkrantz - 1984 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 22 (1):127-147.
The individual variability problem.Dimitria Electra Gatzia - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (3):533-554.
Singular thoughts, seeing doubles and delusional misidentification.P. Gerrans - 2014 - In A. Reboul (ed.), Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan - Volume 2. Switzerland: Springer. pp. 235-248.
Color and the inverted spectrum.Mark Kalderon - manuscript
Anthropological objects and negation.Marie-Jeanne Borel - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (1):7-27.
Metaphorical semeiotic referents: Dyadic objects.Carl R. Hausman - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):276-287.
Metaphorical Semeiotic Referents: Dyadic Objects.Carl R. Hausman - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):276-287.
A modal argument against vague objects.Joseph G. Moore - 2008 - Philosophers' Imprint 8:1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-24

Downloads
183 (#108,896)

6 months
46 (#93,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Mulligan
University of Geneva

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Seeing as and assimilative perception.Kevin Mulligan - 1988 - Brentano Studien 1:129-52.

Add more references