On the "Geach-Mouton line": A reply to Farrell

Philosophical Quarterly 24 (94):69-70 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2218286

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Lowe.P. T. Geach - 1982 - Analysis 42 (1):30 -.
Geach and Relative Identity [with Rejoinder and Reply].Fred Feldman & P. T. Geach - 1968 - Review of Metaphysics 22 (3):547 - 561.
Thinking and time.David L. Mouton - 1969 - Mind 78 (309):60-76.
Hume and Descartes On Self-Acquaintance.David L. Mouton - 1974 - Dialogue 13 (2):255-269.
Physicalism and Immortality.David L. Mouton - 1972 - Religious Studies 8 (1):45 - 53.
In defense of hard-line replies to the multiple-case manipulation argument.Daniel Haas - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):797-811.
Reply to Lowe's Reply.P. T. Geach - 1982 - Analysis 42 (1):32 -.
David Mouton 1932-1986.Dennis Temple - 1986 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60 (1):68 -.
Handbook of Semantics.Maienborn von Heusinger & Mouton Gruyter Portneder (eds.) - forthcoming
Some Remarks on 'Physicalism and Immortality': Reply to David Mouton.Tyson Anderson - 1974 - Religious Studies 10 (1):81 - 84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
6 (#1,464,567)

6 months
1 (#1,475,915)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references