Sexuate difference in a time of terror

Thesis Eleven 120 (1):75-89 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues for the benefits of approaching the terrorist attacks executed by Anders Behring Breivik in Norway on 22 July 2011 from the perspective of Luce Irigaray’s philosophy. In Breivik’s right-wing manifesto 2083, he identifies the triumvirate cultural Marxism, Islam and feminism as the main culprits for Europe’s decay. Despite arguing for the superiority of the white European race, and the dangers of immigration and religious plurality for Europe’s future, Breivik denies the value of difference, be it sexual, cultural or religious. This paper finds support in Irigaray’s philosophy when arguing that, in this respect, Breivik’s extremist ideology operates in alignment with Western metaphysics that posits the masculine European subject as ‘the lord of the earth’, who denies all differences other than the ones hailed by male, white, Christian supremacists. In Norway, the dangers that Breivik and his allies represent are real, given that academics are being targeted and threatened.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ex Captivitate Salus.Carl Schmitt - 1987 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1987 (72):130-130.
Beyond totem and idol, the sexuate other.Luce Irigaray & Karen I. Burke - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (4):353-364.
Terror in and out of power.Dustin Ells Howes - 2012 - European Journal of Political Theory 11 (1):25-58.
Terrorism and the uses of terror.Jeremy Waldron - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (1):5-35.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-16

Downloads
19 (#803,690)

6 months
1 (#1,478,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations