Pragmatic Reflexivity in Self-defeating and Self-justifying Expressions

Argumentation 22 (2):205-216 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Self-defeating and self-justifying expressions are reflexive insofar as they pertain to themselves. However, the reflexivity involved is often pragmatic, i.e., does not entirely depend upon the logical properties of what is expressed but also upon the expressive act. In this paper I present a general account of pragmatic reflexivity and apply it to some familiar self-defeating and self-justifying expressions in epistemology. This application indicates some important, if often neglected features of the epistemological issues involved. The account I defend suggests that epistemology is particularly sensitive to pragmatic reflexivity since what epistemologists do, i.e., inquire, theorize, and defend theories, is also the subject of the inquiry and resultant theories

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
42 (#380,966)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence BonJour - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence Bonjour - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):657-663.
In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence BonJour - 2000 - Noûs 34 (2):302-311.
Pragmatic paradoxes.D. J. O'Connor - 1948 - Mind 57 (227):358-359.

View all 11 references / Add more references