Goodbye to All That The End of Moderate Protectionism in Human Subjects Research

Hastings Center Report 31 (3):9-17 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Federal policies on human subjects research have performed a near‐about face. In the 1970s, policies were motivated chiefly by a belief that subjects needed protection from the harms and risks of research. Now the driving concern is that patients, and the populations they represent, need access to the benefits of research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
Non-human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?M. Quigley - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (11):655-658.
The ethics and politics of human experimentation.Paul Murray McNeill - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.
The Helsinki Declaration: why all the fuss?W. Tadd - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (5):439-450.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
15 (#951,632)

6 months
6 (#530,265)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references