Geç Dönem Wittgenstein Felsefesinde Gramer Kavramı ve Dilin Otonomisi

Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):93-111 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wittgenstein felsefesinin merkezi temasını anlam kavramı oluşturur. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus’ta anlamı dil dışı bir gerçeklikten hareketle tanımlayan Wittgenstein, felsefesinin geç döneminde anlamı dilin kullanımıyla tanımlar. Wittgenstein’ın, “‘anlam nedir?’ sorusunun yeryüzüne inmesi” olarak tanımladığı bu geçiş temel olarak, gramer kavramına dayanmaktadır. Dilin otonomisi, bu dönüşümün önemli bir sonucudur. Bu çalışmada, Wittgenstein’ın gramer kavramı ve bu kavramın bir sonucu olarak dilin otonomisi kavrayışı açık kılınmaya çalışılacaktır. Bunun için öncelikle gramer kavramının Wittgenstein’ın geç dönem felsefesindeki işlevi belirlenecek daha sonra buradan hareketle dilin otonomisinin ne anlama geldiği açıklanacaktır.The concept of ‘meaning’ constitutes the central theme of Wittgenstein’s philosophy. Wittgenstein, who characterizes meaning on the basis of an extra-linguistic reality in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, in the later period of his philosophy, characterizes meaning by use. This transition, which Wittgenstein calls “bring the question ‘what is meaning’ down to earth”, rests on his concept of grammar. Autonomy of language is an important consequence of this transition. In this paper Wittgenstein’s conception of grammar and autonomy of language which results from this conception will be explicated. To this end first the role of the concept of grammar in Wittgenstein’s philosophy will be clarified and then on the basis of this what is meant by the autonomy of language will be explained.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein - Meaning and Representation.Brent Silby - 2007 - Analysis and Metaphysics 6.
Wittgenstein’s Method of Philosophical Analysis.L. Bishwanath Sharma - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:223-235.
La noción de “uso” en el Tractatus de Wittgenstein.Jorge Ruiz Abánades - 2009 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 34 (2):73-88.
Wittgenstein on Language, Meaning, and Use.Dan Nesher - 1992 - International Philosophical Quarterly 32 (1):55-78.
La noción de convención en Wittgenstein.Anastasio Alemán - 1994 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 12 (2):369.
Forms of Life.Peter Hacker - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4:1-20.
Is Wittgenstein a Contextualist?Alberto Voltolini - 2010 - Essays in Philosophy 11 (2):150-167.
Language and Logic in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.Daniele Mezzadri - 2013 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 2 (1):57-80.
Wittgenstein: Science and religion.Rom Harré - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (2):211-237.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-14

Downloads
3 (#1,714,622)

6 months
3 (#982,484)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references