Enabling digital health companionship is better than empowerment

The Lancet 1 (4):e155-e156 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Digital Health Tools (DHTs), also known as patient self-surveilling strategies, have increasingly been promoted by health-care policy makers as technologies that have the capacity to transform patients’ lives. At the heart of the debate is the notion of empowerment. In this paper, we argue that what is required is not so much empowerment but rather a shift to enabling DHTs as digital companions. This will enable policy makers and health-care system designers to provide a more balanced view—one that capitalises on the benefits of DHTs, while minimising the risks of potential harms.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The person in health care policy development.Janet Wallcraft - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (2):347-349.
Beyond health outcomes: the benefits of health care.Gavin Mooney - 1998 - Health Care Analysis 6 (2):99-105.
The Effects of Fraud on the Evaluation of Health Care.Paul Jesilow - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (3):239-245.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-10

Downloads
193 (#103,149)

6 months
71 (#67,378)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jessica Morley
Oxford University
Luciano Floridi
Yale University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references