A Critique of and Alternative to Nancey Murphy’s Christian Physicalism

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8 (2):107--128 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For some time now, Nancey Murphy has been a major voice on behalf of a certain form of Christian physicalism. This is a part of her project of reconciling science with Christian faith. In what follows, I shall state and criticize the three central components of her Christian physicalism, followed by a presentation of a dualist alternative along with a clarification of its advantages over Murphy-style physicalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theology, Science and Human Nature.Nancey Murphy - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 740--747.
Using MacIntyre's method in Christian ethics.Nancey Murphy - 1997 - In Nancey C. Murphy, Brad J. Kallenberg & Mark Nation (eds.), Virtues & Practices in the Christian Tradition: Christian Ethics After Macintyre. University of Notre Dame Press. pp. 30--44.
Non-reductive physicalism?A. D. Smith - 1993 - In Howard M. Robinson (ed.), Objections to Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
Do Humans Have Souls? Perspectives from Philosophy, Science, and Religion.Nancey Murphy - 2013 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 67 (1):30-41.
Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies?Nancey C. Murphy - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Physicalism, supervenience and the fundamental level.Robin Brown & James Ladyman - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):20-38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-10

Downloads
83 (#204,451)

6 months
5 (#649,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references