Tinged shareholder theory: or what’s so special about stakeholders?

Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (2):117-127 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper contrasts the normative foundations of the stakeholder and shareholder theories of the firm. It demonstrates how the shareholder theory of the firm appears to have at least as much normative support as stakeholder theory and suggests that a way forward may be for a variant of pure shareholder theory to emerge.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/beer.1999.8.issue-2

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Tinged shareholder theory: Or what's so special about stakeholders?Geoff Moore - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (2):117–127.
"i Paid For This Microphone!" The Importance Of Shareholder Theory In Business Ethics.David Levy & Mark Mitschow - 2009 - Libertarian Papers 1:25.
Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business.Bruce Langtry - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):431-443.
Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’.Samuel Mansell - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):583-599.
Stakeholder Risk as Experienced by Non-Shareholder Stakeholders: An Ethical Analysis and Risk Magnitude Model.Whitney Davis & Harry J. Van Buren Iii - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:431-436.
Stakeholder Risk as Experienced by Non-Shareholder Stakeholders.Whitney Davis & Harry J. van Buren Iii - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:431-436.
Enlightened Shareholder Maximization: Is this Strategy Achievable?Pamela E. Queen - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 127 (3):683-694.
Should We Draw a Line Between Business And Ethics?Yusuke Kaneko - 2011 - The ACERP 2011 Conference Proceedings 1 (1):195-208.
Toward a Common Good Theory of the Firm: The Tasubinsa Case.Alejo José G. Sison - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):471-480.
Stakeholder Voice: A Problem, a Solution and a Challenge for Managers and Academics.Harry J. van Buren Iii & Michelle Greenwood - 2009 - Philosophy of Management 8 (3):15-23.
The Nature of the Firm, Agency Theory and Shareholder Theory: A Critique from Philosophical Anthropology.Joan Fontrodona & Alejo José G. Sison - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):33-42.
Shareholders vs. Stakeholders: How Liberal and Libertarian Political Philosophy Frames the Basic Debate in Business Ethics.David Rönnegard & N. Craig Smith - 2013 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 32 (3-4):183-220.
Effective Shareholder Engagement: The Factors that Contribute to Shareholder Salience.E. James & M. Gifford - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 92 (S1):79 - 97.
Shareholder Wealth Maximization and Social Welfare: A Utilitarian Critique.Thomas M. Jones & Will Felps - 2013 - Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (2):207-238.
Compensating Outside Directors with Stock: The Impact on Non-Primary Stakeholders. [REVIEW]Yuval Deutsch & Mike Valente - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (1):67-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
21 (#736,702)

6 months
6 (#518,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Geoff Moore
Durham University

Citations of this work

The Stakeholder Model Refined.Yves Fassin - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):113-135.
Differentiating stakeholder theories.John Kaler - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (1):71 - 83.
Business Ethics and the 'End of History' in Corporate Law.Joseph Heath - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):5-20.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references