Nominal definitions of 'culture'

Philosophy of Science 19 (4):245-256 (1952)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many social scientists report that they find it difficult to frame adequate definitions of the important terms of the field. At present they are definition-shy. It is the purpose of this paper to show that this avoidance reaction is neither necessary nor desirable as a means for advancing social science. In order that this be made clear, an analysis of an important term will be presented. First, however, a few preparatory questions about the technique of defining must be asked and answered.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
226 (#90,251)

6 months
7 (#439,668)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Critical note on "culture" and "learning-theory".Carl H. Hamburg - 1954 - Philosophy of Science 21 (4):344-347.
Moore's nominal definitions of 'culture'.T. Foster Lindley - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (4):335-338.
A reappraisal of the concept of 'culture'.Larry Brownstein - 1995 - Social Epistemology 9 (4):311 – 351.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references