Ethical review and qualitative research competence: Guidance for reviewers and applicants

Research Ethics 13 (3-4):128-138 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is difficult to consider, describe or address the ethical issues particular to qualitative research without experience and understanding of the technicalities of qualitative methodologies. The Australian National Statement on the Ethical Conduct of Research Involving Humans charges researchers with a responsibility to demonstrate that they have the appropriate experience, qualifications and competence for their proposed research. Ethical review committees have the responsibility to judge claimed research competence. This article provides practical guidance to researchers and review committees on using formal qualifications and training, explicit claims of competence, and markers of in/competence to assess qualitative research competence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Professional Ethics Considerations of Research Ethics Board Members in Canada.Maureen Muldoon - 2006 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 25 (1-4):67-80.
Ethics of field research: Do journals set the standard?Helene Marsh & Carole M. Eros - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (3):375-382.
Ethical Competence for Teachers: A Possible Model.Roxana-Maria Ghiațău - 2015 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 2 (3):387–403.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-26

Downloads
24 (#673,324)

6 months
2 (#1,243,547)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?