Some Thoughts Concerning the Main Goals of Competition Law

Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 20 (2):627-642 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse different goals of the competition law, which are established in European Union and Lithuania. EU Commission and the Court of Justice distinguish a number of goals of the competition law. Most commonly, mentioned goals of competition law are the following: the integration of the Internal Market, the protection of consumers, protection of the competitors, freedom of competition and economic efficiency. Different goals of competition law are analysed in this paper and relationship between them is explained. Special attention is given to the analysis of protection of the consumers as one of the main objectives of competition law. While analysing protection of the consumers in competition law, a difference between the concept of consumer in competition law and consumer protection law is explained. The authors express a number of critical thoughts towards practice of the EU Commission and the Court of Justice so far, as there is a lack of consistency in evaluation of the protection of consumers’ rights in the context of the other objectives of competition law. Relevance of the present article is supported by the several facts such as revision of the competition law goals by the EU Commission and adoption of resolution “Concerning priority of the activities of the Lithuanian Competition Council” by the Lithuanian Competition Council that establishes main principles (priorities) applied while implementing competition policy in Lithuania. Setting out the main goals in Lithuanian competition law may have important practical consequences in the everyday activities of the Lithuanian national competition authority

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Importance of the Intent in Predatory Pricing Cases.Raimundas Moisejevas - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 122 (4):319-334.
The market, competition, and equality.Peter Dietsch - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (2):213-244.
Non-Competition Covenants in Case of a Business Transfer.Virginijus Bitė - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (1):177-198.
Intensity of competition and the choice between product and process innovation.Giacomo Bonanno - 1998 - International Journal of Industrial Organization 16 (4):495-510.
Objective Justifications in Predatory Pricing.Raimundas Moisejevas - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (1):213-232.
Distribution of responsibility, ability and competition.Johan J. Graafland - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 45 (1-2):133 - 147.
The Wider Concerns of Competition Law.Okeoghene Odudu - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (3):599-613.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
42 (#377,979)

6 months
15 (#165,714)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references