Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm

New York, US: Oxford University Press USA (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Intricate Ethics, Kamm questions the moral importance of some non-consequentialist distinctions and then introduces and argues for the moral importance of other distinctions. The first section discusses nonconsequentialist ethical theory and the trolley problem; the second deals with the notions of moral status and rights; the third takes up the issues of responsibility and complicity and the possible moral significance of distance; and the fourth section analyzes the views of others in the non-consequentialist and consequentialist camps.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kamm and Miller on Rights' Compatibility.Rowan Cruft - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (4):393 - 401.
Schefflerian ethics and corporate social responsibility.J. Angelo Corlett - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):631 - 638.
Intricate Ethics.Elinor Mason - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (4):621-623.
The role of moral commitments in moral judgment.Tania Lombrozo - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (2):273-286.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-14

Downloads
27 (#591,649)

6 months
12 (#217,158)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frances Kamm
Harvard University

Citations of this work

Scalar consequentialism the right way.Neil Sinhababu - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (12):3131-3144.
Each Counts for One.Daniel Muñoz - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies.
Epistemology Personalized.Matthew A. Benton - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (269):813-834.

View all 84 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references