Primate theory of mind is a Turing test

&
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):127-128 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heyes's literature review of deception, imitation, and self-recognition is inadequate, misleading, and erroneous. The anaesthetic artifact hypothesis of self-recognition is unsupported by the data she herself examines. Her proposed experiment is tantalizing, indicating that theory of mind is simply a Turing test.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x98360707

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Subcognition and the limits of the Turing test.Robert M. French - 1990 - Mind 99 (393):53-66.
Turing test: 50 years later.Ayse Pinar Saygin, Ilyas Cicekli & Varol Akman - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):463-518.
The status and future of the Turing test.James H. Moor - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
On Turing's Turing test and why the matter matters.Justin Leiber - 1995 - Synthese 104 (1):59-69.
A simple comment regarding the Turing test.Benny Shanon - 1989 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (June):249-56.
The Turing test.B. Jack Copeland - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):519-539.
Other bodies, other minds: A machine incarnation of an old philosophical problem. [REVIEW]Stevan Harnad - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (1):43-54.
Turing test, easy to pass; human mind, hard to understand.Cristi Stoica - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#446,058)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Minds, machines and Turing: The indistinguishability of indistinguishables.Stevan Harnad - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):425-445.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references