The simplest Lewis-style triviality proof yet?

Analysis 63 (4):300–303 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/1467-8284.00441

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Quick triviality proofs for probabilities of conditionals.Peter Milne - 1997 - Analysis 57 (1):75–80.
Paraconsistent logics included in Lewis’ S4.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (3):442-466.
The problem of noncounterfactual conditionals.David Etlin - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):676-688.
Triviality arguments against functionalism.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (2):273 - 295.
Russell's completeness proof.Peter Milne - 2008 - History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (1):31-62.
Technical report tr-Arp-11-94.Greg Restall - unknown
Lewis and his critics on putnam´s paradox.Daniel Dohrn - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
104 (#168,148)

6 months
5 (#637,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Milne
University of Stirling

Citations of this work

The Strongest Possible Lewisian Triviality Result.Branden Fitelson - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):69-74.
What we can learn from how trivalent conditionals avoid triviality.Daniel Lassiter - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (9-10):1087-1114.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references