Karl Popper: The Formative Years, 1902–1945; Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna [Book Review]

Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:399-404 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When Karl Popper’s The Open Society and its Enemies 1 was published in 1945, shortly after the second World War had ended, his work soon became a classic for the defence and support of the western alliance against Soviet communism and Stalinism in the cold war. This interpretation primarily provided by authors of conservative liberalism emphasised Popper’s criticism of the historicistic theories of Karl Marx as well as his new contributions for the defence of western democracy, to social philosophy and the philosophy of history. A different interpretation of Popper’s work was provided in the early seventies of the 20th century by authors of social-democratic orientation and by those who belonged to progressive liberalism.2 After having discarded Marxist thought as a theoretical foundation of practical politics, some social democratic and progressive liberal thinkers looked for new theoretical foundations that could serve as new guidelines for policy measures. In actual politics Marxist ideas as guidelines for policy measures had long been substituted by reform policies, and a new theoretical and philosophical foundation was required in order to solve the discrepancy between the theoretical basis and policy measures. Popper’s ideas with respect to the social welfare state, western democratic institutions, liberalism, policy measures and the methods of social science seemed to provide such a new theoretical foundation. Some authors even thought that Popper’s philosophy of Critical Rationalism ought to be regarded as revival of the so-called Bernstein tradition in social democracy. However, although it seems that some ideas of Critical Rationalism indeed became a kind of theoretical guideline for social democratic policy measures, Critical Rationalism rather was regarded as a support of conservative liberalism and particularly in the late 70ies and 80ies as a kind illegitimate offspring of Hayekianism. Given this spectrum of possible interpretations of Popper’s ideas it is not surprising that politicians from the conservative right to the progressive left all quote parts of Popper’s work in order to support their positions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Popper and Hayek on Reason and Tradition.Jack Birner - 2014 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (3):263-281.
Karl popper—the formative years, 1902–1945: Politics and philosophy in interwar vienna.Stefano Gattei - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):815-825.
Karl Popper: Political Philosophy.William Gorton - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Popper's social‐democratic politics and free‐market liberalism.Fred Eidlin - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):25-48.
Popper, political philosophy, and social democracy: Reply to Eidlin.Jeremy Shearmur - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):361-376.
In memoriam: Karl Popper.Cecilia Tohaneanu - 2014 - Sfera Politicii (177).
Karl Raimund Popper.Nicholas Maxwell - 2002 - In Leemon McHenry, P. Dematteis & P. Fosl (eds.), British Philosophers, 1800-2000. Bruccoli Clark Layman. pp. 176-194.
Karl Popper, 1902–1994: Radical fallibilism, political theory, and democracy.Fred Eidlin - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (1):135-153.
Recovering popper: For the left?Bruce Caldwell - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):49-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
12 (#1,092,565)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Stefano Gattei: Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Science: Rationality Without Foundations. [REVIEW]Jan Radler - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (2):411-414.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references