Innate ideas in Stoicism and Grotius

Grotiana 22 (1):157-175 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers have long debated whether any ideas are innate in the human mind and if so, what they might be. The issues here are real and important but it often seems that the discussion of them isn’t. One of the main reasons that these discussions are frequently so frustrating is that the various sides seem to be talking past each other rather than engaging in genuine argument. When this happens, it seems to me that it is usually because the issues they are discussing have not been formulated clearly enough. To avoid that problem and also to motivate what follows, I want to begin with an overview of some philosophical concepts and questions before I get to the historical part of my paper.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#341,462)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jon A. Miller
Queen's University

Citations of this work

Popper’s Evolutionary Therapy to Meno’s Paradox.Vikram Singh Sirola & Lalit Saraswat - 2019 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 36 (1):151-166.
Enter secularisation: Heinsius's De tragoediae constitutione.Mark Somos - 2010 - History of European Ideas 36 (1):19-38.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references