Ethics of Expert Evidence

Australian Law Journal 87 (9):628-638 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The use of expert evidence in courts has been problematic for many years and a focus on the ethics of witnesses has given rise to the widespread introduction of rules governing how experts may behave. But, in additions to the ethics of witnesses, the ethics of expert evidence also encompasses the ethics of lawyers; the financial and other costs of using experts; the use, or misuse, of science; the way claims to truth are made; and the impact on the law itself. In short, despite recent clarification of rules for witnesses, there remain significant issues with how the legal system makes use of expert testimony. This article explores some of those issues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics Expert Testimony: Against the Skeptics.G. J. Agich & B. J. Spielman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (4):381-403.
The journalism educator as expert witness.Roy L. Moore - 1997 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 12 (2):82 – 95.
Confessions of an Expert Ethics Witness.K. Kipnis - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (4):325-343.
Bioethics in a Legal Forum: Confessions of an "Expert" Witness.J. C. Fletcher - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (4):297-324.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-17

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephan John Millett
Curtin University, Western Australia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references