A critique of positive psychology—or 'the new science of happiness'

Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):591-608 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that the new science of positive psychology is founded on a whole series of fallacious arguments; these involve circular reasoning, tautology, failure to clearly define or properly apply terms, the identification of causal relations where none exist, and unjustified generalisation. Instead of demonstrating that positive attitudes explain achievement, success, well-being and happiness, positive psychology merely associates mental health with a particular personality type: a cheerful, outgoing, goal-driven, status-seeking extravert.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
820 (#18,829)

6 months
9 (#317,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The snake oil charms of positive psychology.Michael A. Peters & Marek Tesar - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (11):1116-1119.
Virtue through Challenge: Moral Development and Self‐transformation.Alistair Miller - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (4):785-800.
Constancy and integrity: (un)measurable virtues?Angus Robson - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (S2):S115-S129.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration.Peter Goldie - 2000 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.

View all 11 references / Add more references