Imposibility of Two-Valued Logic to Be Universally Valid

Sorites 12:55-59 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If two-valued logic is assumed to be universally valid, it leads to a paradox, for a proof can thereby be found that it is impossible for two-valued logic to be universally valid. This consequence results in some very significant philosophical implications for the physical sciences and mathematics, especially since they are both based exclusively on two-valued logic

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Finiteness in infinite-valued łukasiewicz logic.Stefano Aguzzoli & Agata Ciabattoni - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (1):5-29.
How to avoid deviance (in logic).Walter Sinnott-Armstrong & Amit Malhotra - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):215--36.
Algorithmic logic. Multiple-valued extensions.Helena Rasiowa - 1979 - Studia Logica 38 (4):317 - 335.
Three-valued logics in modal logic.Barteld Kooi & Allard Tamminga - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (5):1061-1072.
Note on a six-valued extension of three-valued logic.Josep M. Font & Massoud Moussavi - 1993 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 3 (2):173-187.
Product Ł ukasiewicz Logic.Rostislav Horčík & Petr Cintula - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (4):477-503.
Bourne on future contingents and three-valued logic.Daisuke Kachi - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (1):33-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references