Charles Taylor, de la autointerpretación a la participación política

Anuario Filosófico 36 (75-76):440-454 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Taylor's political proposal is based on a particular way of explaining human action. The modern ideal of authenticity is used to underline the role of responsibility in personal agency. Aristotelian prudence or phronesis is considered one of the best interpretations of practical reason for completing the ideal of authenticity because it includes the distinction among goods and their influence in everyone's life. The contemporary notion of horizon is an aid for understanding the role of cultural frames and dialogical exchange in the construction of personal identity

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who are we?: Modern identities between Taylor and Foucault.Allison Weir - 2009 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):533-553.
Charles Taylor and Paul Ricoeur on Self-Interpretations and Narrative Identity.Arto Laitinen - 2002 - In Rauno Huttunen, Hannu L. T. Heikkinen & Leena Syrjälä (eds.), Narrative Research: Voices of Teachers and Philosophers. Jyväskylä: SoPhi. pp. 57-71.
The Ethics of Authenticity.Charles Taylor - 1991 - Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
8 (#1,339,625)

6 months
5 (#703,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references