Teaching Responsible Research and Innovation: A Phronetic Perspective

Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (2):597-615 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Across the European research area and beyond, efforts are being mobilized to align research and innovation processes and products with societal values and needs, and to create mechanisms for inclusive priority setting and knowledge production. A central concern is how to foster a culture of “Responsible Research and Innovation” among scientists and engineers. This paper focuses on RRI teaching at higher education institutions. On the basis of interviews and reviews of academic and policy documents, it highlights the generic aspects of teaching aimed at invoking a sense of care and societal obligation, and provides a set of exemplary cases of RRI-related teaching. It argues that the Aristotelian concept of phronesis can capture core properties of the objectives of RRI-related teaching activities. Teaching should nurture the students’ capacity in terms of practical wisdom, practical ethics, or administrative ability in order to enable them to act virtuously and responsibly in contexts which are often characterized by uncertainty, contention, and controversy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Managing to Innovate in Higher Education.Harold Silver - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2):145 - 156.
Ethics and the University.Michael Davis - 1998 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-07

Downloads
59 (#273,450)

6 months
39 (#98,292)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?