Investigating and designing social robots from a role-theoretical perspective: Response to “Social interaction with robots—three questions”. In Gesa Lindemann

&
AI and Society 31 (4):581-585 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s00146-015-0635-2

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

From an engineers point of view: response to “Social interaction with robots—three questions”. In Gesa Lindemann.Atsuo Takanishi - 2016 - AI and Society 31 (4):577-580.
Social interaction with robots: three questions.Gesa Lindemann - 2016 - AI and Society 31 (4):573-575.
Modeling the acceptance of socially interactive robotics: Social presence in human–robot interaction.Dong-Hee Shin & Hyungseung Choo - 2011 - Interaction Studies 12 (3):430-460.
You and I, robot.Shaun Gallagher - 2013 - AI and Society 28 (4):455-460.
The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots.Christoph Bartneck, Tomohiro Suzuki, Takayuki Kanda & Tatsuya Nomura - 2007 - AI and Society 21 (1-2):217-230.
Social cognition and social robots.Shaun Gallagher - 2007 - Pragmatics and Cognition 15 (3):435-453.
Social behaviours in dog-owner interactions can serve as a model for designing social robots.Tamás Faragó, Ádám Miklósi, Beáta Korcsok, Judit Száraz & Márta Gácsi - 2014 - Interaction Studies 15 (2):143-172.
Humanoid robots as “The Cultural Other”: are we able to love our creations? [REVIEW]Min-Sun Kim & Eun-Joo Kim - 2013 - AI and Society 28 (3):309-318.
In the hands of machines? The future of aged care.Robert Sparrow & Linda Sparrow - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (2):141-161.
Mental models of robots among senior citizens: An interview study of interaction expectations and design implications.Justin Walden, Eun Hwa Jung, S. Shyam Sundar & Ariel Celeste Johnson - 2015 - Interaction Studies 16 (1):68-88.
Social behaviours in dog-owner interactions can serve as a model for designing social robots.Tamás Faragó, Ádám Miklósi, Beáta Korcsok, Judit Száraz & Márta Gácsi - 2014 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 15 (2):143-172.
Can we trust robots?Mark Coeckelbergh - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):53-60.
Special issue on: Going beyond the laboratory—reconsidering the ELS implications of autonomous robots.Gesa Lindemann, Hironori Matsuzaki & Ilona Straub - 2016 - AI and Society 31 (4):441-444.
Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction.Tatsuya Nomura, Takayuki Kanda & Tomohiro Suzuki - 2006 - AI and Society 20 (2):138-150.
Questionnaire-based social research on opinions of Japanese visitors for communication robots at an exhibition.Tatsuya Nomura, Takugo Tasaki, Takayuki Kanda, Masahiro Shiomi, Hiroshi Ishiguro & Norihiro Hagita - 2007 - AI and Society 21 (1-2):167-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
34 (#474,174)

6 months
7 (#441,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction.Kerstin Dautenhahn - 2007 - In Nathan Emery, Nicola Clayton & Chris Frith (eds.), Social Intelligence: From Brain to Culture. Oxford University Press.

Add more references