Theoria, Aisthesis, Mimesis and Doxa

Diogenes 38 (151):131-148 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theoria, aisthesis, mimesis and doxa are terms that sometimes are opposed, and sometimes their particular relationships are denied. However, the system of the paradox that often animates esthetic theories and conceptions of mimesis have only the pathetic enjoyment of reclaimed and affirmed unsolvable questions. Therefore it would be well to grasp the historical configuration that ordered the play of these concepts and their evolution up until our contemporary poetics.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/039219219003815107

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Nuevas revistas: DOXA. Los filósofos Dei derecho quieren polémica.Victoria Camps - 1987 - Theoria 3 (1):619-620.
“DOXA” cuadernos de filosofía Del derecho. Nemero.María Ángeles Barrere Unzueta & F. J. Ezquiaga Ganuzas - 1988 - Theoria 4 (1):249-255.
Aisthesis and aesthetics.Erwin Walter Straus & Richard Marion Griffith (eds.) - 1970 - Pittsburgh, Pa.,: Duquesne University Press.
Mimesis as make-believe: on the foundations of the representational arts.Kendall L. Walton - 1990 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mimesis as a phenomenon of semiotic communication.Timo Maran - 2003 - Sign Systems Studies 31 (1):191-215.
Mimesis and art. Studies in the origin and early development of an aesthetic vocabulary.Eva Schaper - 1973 - Theoria 39 (1-3):171-173.
Transforming Mimesis.Daniel L. Tate - 2008 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):185-208.
Mimesis on the move: Theodor W. Adorno's concept of imitation.Karla L. Schultz - 1990 - New York: P. Lang.
Mimesis H. Koller: Die Mimesis in der Antike. Nachahmung, Darstellung, Ausdruck. Pp. 235. Berne: Francke, 1954. Paper, 22 Sw. fr. [REVIEW]J. Tate - 1955 - The Classical Review 5 (3-4):258-260.
Mimesis in Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory.Bed P. Paudyal - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (8):1-10.
False Pleasures, Appearance and Imagination in the Philebus.Sylvain Delcomminette - 2003 - Phronesis 48 (3):215 - 237.
False Pleasures, Appearance and Imagination in the Philebus.Sylvain Delcomminette - 2003 - Phronesis 48 (3):215-237.
Mimesis Güron Sörbom: Mimesis and Art. Studies in the Origin and Early Development of an Aesthetic Vocabulary. Pp. 218. Stockholm: Svenska Bokförlaget, 1966. Paper, Kr. 42. [REVIEW]D. W. Lucas - 1968 - The Classical Review 18 (02):190-192.
The movement of mimesis: Heidegger's 'origin of the work of art' in relation to Adorno and Lyotard.Tom Huhn - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (4):45-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
85 (#199,619)

6 months
9 (#315,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references