Study participants incentives, compensation and reimbursement in resource-constrained settings

BMC Medical Ethics 14 (S1):1-11 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Controversies still exists within the research fraternity on the form and level of incentives, compensation and reimbursement to study participants in resource-constrained settings. While most research activities contribute significantly to advancement of mankind, little has been considered in rewarding directly the research participants from resource-constrained areas. A study was conducted in Zimbabwe to investigate views and expectations of various stakeholders on study participation incentives, compensation and reimbursement issues. Data was collected using various methods including a survey of about 1,008 parents/guardians of school children participating in various immunological cohort studies and parasitology surveys. Community advisory boards (CABs) at 9 of the sites were also consulted. Further, information was gathered during discussions held at a basic research ethics training workshop. The workshop had 45 participants that including 40 seasoned Zimbabwean researchers and 5 international research collaborators. About 90% (907) of the study participants and guardians expected compensation of reasonable value, in view of the researchers' value and comparison to other sites regardless of economic status of the community. During discussion with researchers at a basic ethics training workshop, about 80% (32) believed that decisions on level of compensation should be determined by the local research ethics committees. While, the few international research collaborators were of the opinion that compensation should be in accordance with local guidelines, and incentives should be in line with funding. Both the CAB members and study participants expressed that there should be a clear distinction between study incentive and compensation accorded to individual and community expectations on benefits from studies. However, CABs expressed that their suggestions on incentives and compensation are often moderated by the regulatory authorities who cite fear of unknown concerns. Overall, both personal and community benefits need to be considered colectively in future studies to be conducted in resource-constrained communities. There is projected fear that recruitment in future may be a challenge, now that almost every community, has somehow been reached and participated in some form of studies. A major concern on reimbursement, compensation or incentives should be internationally pegged regardless of different economic status of the individuals or communities where the study is to be conducted.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paternity fraud and compensation for misattributed paternity.H. Draper - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):475-480.
Participants' responsibilities in clinical research.David B. Resnik & Elizabeth Ness - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (12):746-750.
The Ethics of Commercial Surrogate Mothering: A Response to Casey Humbyrd.Peter Omonzejele - 2011 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17 (1):110-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
12 (#1,111,684)

6 months
3 (#1,042,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?