REC Members' Perceptions of Their Training Needs: Report of an AREC Audit

Research Ethics 2 (4):119-131 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Association of Research Ethics Committees is one of the leading providers of training and education for members of Research Ethics Committees. The introduction of the research governance strategy and the increasing complexity of ethical review place great demands on research ethics committee members that in turn creates challenges for training providers. This paper presents the outcome of an audit of REC members' views about training. Findings demonstrate that REC members are not a homogenous group. Several distinct sub-groups, each with particular training needs emerged. All showed a preference for short, easily accessible events in which there were opportunities for discussion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Audit committee features and earnings management: Further evidence from singapore.J.-L. W. Mitchell Der Zahvann & Greg Tower - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):233-258.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
12 (#1,090,149)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Infinity and Beyond.Roger Rawbone - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (4):129-130.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references