Pragmatism, Consciousness and Spirituality: William James and Rudolf Steiner

In Ananta Kumar Giri (ed.), Pragmatism, Spirituality and Society: New Pathways of Consciousness, Freedom and Solidarity. Springer Singapore. pp. 27-39 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay discusses the similarities and differences between the pragmatic pluralist philosophy of William James and the esoteric philosophy of Rudolf Steiner. James write wrote his Varietiesof Religious Experience as a psychologist of religious experience. He also spent thirty years researching psychical experience. James’s developed his position so as to avoid scientific and religious dogmatism. In the process, he generated countless tentative suggestions. Steiner similarly rejects dogmatic science and religion and in the process offers extensive claims and methods outside the dominant paradigm. James created the field of psychology of religion; Steiner created the esoteric method of spirit science or anthroposophy and its implications, including the Waldorf approach to education and biodynamic agriculture.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

William James's conception of truth.Bertrand Russell - 1992 - In William James & Doris Olin (eds.), William James: Pragmatism, in Focus. Routledge.
On the Path Towards Thinking: Learning from Martin Heidegger and Rudolf Steiner.Bo Dahlin - 2009 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (6):537-554.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-10

Downloads
13 (#1,062,726)

6 months
3 (#1,042,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references