How Kant might explain ugliness

British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):205-228 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A number of recent studies have claimed to explain how Kant can or cannot accommodate pure judgements of ugliness in his aesthetic theory. In this paper I critically review the arguments on each side of the debate and then develop a new account of how Kant might explain the pure judgement of the ugly, namely, by appeal to the quickening of the faculties in their harmonious free play. Some implications and applications of such an explanation are then explored, including a rethink of the nature of beauty and ugliness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aesthetic judging and the intentionality of pleasure.Hannah Ginsborg - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):164 – 181.
Aesthetic judgment.Nick Zangwill - 2003 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On ugliness.Umberto Eco (ed.) - 2007 - New York: Rizzoli.
Beauty and testimony.Robert Hopkins - 2000 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 47:209-236.
Sublimity, ugliness, and formlessness in Kant's aesthetic theory.Theodore A. Gracyk - 1986 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (1):49-56.
Thomson's problems with Kant: A comment on "Kant's problems with ugliness".Paul Guyer - 1992 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50 (4):317-319.
Kant's problems with ugliness.Garrett Thomson - 1992 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50 (2):107-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
91 (#187,285)

6 months
17 (#146,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?