The exhaustion particles in the yi group: A unified approach to all, the completive and the superlative

Journal of Semantics 24 (1):27-72 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The exhaustion particles of the Yi languages are sentence-end morphemes with a surprising wealth of possible interpretations. With gradeable states they convey the meaning of superlative, with accomplishments they function as completive particle, and in ungradeable states, activities or achievements they act as all particles, i.e. as universal non-distributive quantifiers, on the first argument. A unified account of the all -, completive - and superlative -meanings is proposed. It is argued that all three notions basically divide their respective domain into three types: a singular domain type, a quantized domain type and a homogeneous domain type. For events there is also a fourth domain type, the bounded domain type, which does not have an analogy with objects and states. Object-denotations Event-denotations State-denotations Singular Individual OD Punctual ED Ungradeable SD Quantized Quantized OD Quantized ED State with quantized comparison class Bounded — Bounded ED — Homogeneous Homogeneous OD Homogeneous ED State with homogeneous comparison class The all -, the completive - and the superlative -meanings of the exhaustion particles have in common that they are incompatible with entities from the singular domain type, pragmatically implausible with entities from the homogeneous domain type, and compatible with entities from the quantized domain type.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Compositionality without word boundaries: (the) more and (the) most.Anna Szabolcsi - 2012 - Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 22.
Modal superlatives: a compositional analysis. [REVIEW]Maribel Romero - 2013 - Natural Language Semantics 21 (1):79-110.
Group beliefs.Raimo Tuomela - 1992 - Synthese 91 (3):285-318.
Predicting the motion of particles in Newtonian mechanics and special relativity.C. G., G. R. & H. J. - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (1):81-122.
Canonical Proper-Time Dirac Theory.Tepper L. Gill - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (10):1561-1575.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-15

Downloads
35 (#459,535)

6 months
1 (#1,478,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Sample logic.Matthias Gerner - 2022 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 30 (5):728-776.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references