The Right to Mission in Human Rights Law, “Mission to Amish People” and “Jews for Jesus”

Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 14 (42):78-99 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the position of international human rights law towards missionary or proselytizing activities with a special focus on the American context. By evaluating UN legal acts such as the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the 1960 Arcot Krishnaswami Study and the 1981 Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief and the American Convention of Human Rights, it investigates the extent to which such activities fall within the scope of the right to free speech and to freedom of religion for religious organizations. This is exemplified by looking at two Evangelical religious organizations founded for the purpose of luring away groups of believers from their original religious communities: “Mission to Amish People”, targeting the Amish People, and “Jews for Jesus”, aimed at the Jewish community. The clash of one religious community which considers mission a fundamental element of its religion with a religious community who is highly skeptical about mission constitute the extreme test case of the right to free speech and to corporate freedom of religion. Given the highly various importance which mission can play in different religions, the article suggests to solve each case individually by carefully examining the content of each religious doctrine

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religion, Religions, and Human Rights.Louis Henkin - 1998 - Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):229-239.
Is There a Human Right to Freedom of Religion?Paul Tiedemann - 2015 - Human Rights Review 16 (2):83-98.
The Sovereignty of Human Rights.Patrick Macklem - 2015 - Oxford University Press USA.
Why rights? Why me?Jonathan K. Crane - 2007 - Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (4):559-589.
Religious Freedom in Theory and Practice.Jonathan Fox - 2015 - Human Rights Review 16 (1):1-22.
The Human Rights Protection Regulations of Shandong Province.[author unknown] - 1999 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 31 (1):93-94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-03

Downloads
20 (#770,420)

6 months
6 (#528,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references