Reply to professor Putnam

&
Philosophy of Science 31 (1):7-9 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/287972

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Van Fraassen's dissolution of Putnam's model-theoretic argument.Mathias Frisch - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (1):158-164.
Dichotomies and Artifacts: A Reply to Professor Hookway.Jaime Nubiola - 2008 - In Rivas Monroy , Cancela Silva & Martínez Vidal (eds.), Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. pp. 71-80.
Comments on professor Putnam's comments.H. Margenau & E. P. Wigner - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):292-293.
Comments on comments on comments: A reply to Margenau and Wigner.Hilary Putnam - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (1):1-6.
Reply to professor Beck.Henry Margenau - 1950 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 11 (4):574-578.
A note on Putnam and the transitivity of the real.Charles E. Cardwell - 1972 - Philosophical Studies 23 (6):414 - 417.
Linguistics and philosophy.Noam A. Chomsky - 1969 - In Sidney Hook (ed.), Language and Philosophy. New York University Press.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
Realism and reason.Hilary Putnam (ed.) - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#296,142)

6 months
13 (#217,044)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A phenomenological solution to the measurement problem? Husserl and the foundations of quantum mechanics.Steven French - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (3):467-491.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Comments on the paper of David sharp.Hilary Putnam - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):234-237.
Comments on professor Putnam's comments.H. Margenau & E. P. Wigner - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):292-293.

Add more references